Schizophrenics are different from normal people in that they do not have a desire for power and they are not capable of feeling hatred. Another characteristic is that they have replaced the idea of submissiveness with morality, which is their source to happiness in life. This has been a mystery that has eluded the medical profession throughout history how these individuals can be happy despite the discrimination against them. The idea people have of assigning different values to people is completely incomprehensible to schizophrenics.
I will start by introducing a few famous people that I’ve judged to have schizophrenia as defined above. From there I will look into the original conflict that gave birth to the structural violence that we today call schizophrenia. I will point finger at an individual that I strongly feel is guilty of organising the persecution of schizophrenics. After that I will look into how the schizophrenic has fit into evolution. Based on this I will try to explain the behaviour towards the schizophrenic in today’s society. Finally I will present my view of how I think the schizophrenic fits into modern society.
The existing definition of schizophrenia is an example of structural violence, prejudice, and projection on behalf of psychiatrists. It is a piece of shit that has nothing to do with science. I even dare to say that schizophrenia in some cases can be diagnosed at birth due to physical signs. I doubt however that the full truth of schizophrenia will ever be known, since knowledge is power. That is my way of pointing out that the medical profession has a lot to lose and very little to gain from speaking the truth. The only thing they got to gain is dignity.
The first famous person is Buddha. He was born a son of a king, but it is my understanding that he was married in order to produce a child, at which time Buddha himself got kicked out of the kingdom. Buddhism is a philosophy with psychological advice on how to become happy. Today we call the psychology used by Buddha for cognitive. To be able to develop this philosophy at that time must represent the greatest intellectual achievement in the history of mankind. Obvious signs of Buddha’s schizophrenia are his morality and indifference to people’s background, which expresses itself in that he speaks to thieves just as well as to priests.
Next we have Socrates. His life was a salutation to morality. He lived and breathed morality and in the end he died for it. Signs of his schizophrenia are his morality and the voice that he said guided him.
After that comes Jesus, the most obvious schizophrenic. Jesus had morality quite obviously and treated a whore with the outmost respect. His teaching is one of a kind since it is about love. I don’t want to make any interpretations or predictions to why Jesus brought this gospel to mankind. Regarding Jesus signs as a schizophrenic it’s enough to say that any claim of it today gets you locked up.
In modern time we have Henri Charriere, the author of the self biography Papillon. Henri's nature was evident in his non-judgemental way and of always trying to behave with dignity despite being convicted falsely for murder. At the end of his life he also forgives those responsible for his wrongful conviction. His schizophrenia is evident in that he has morality that helps him to never become the animal society is trying to make of him.
Another person I suspect of being schizophrenic is Janis Joplin who expressed a lot of love in her singing. I have the feeling of that Janis’ death was no accident. The most schizophrenic about Janis is probably her loneliness, which she shares with so many schizophrenics in today’s society.
Finally I claim that Dalai Lama has a schizophrenic nature to honour the memory of Buddha.
Originally the structural violence against the schizophrenic might have arised from his criticism of the selfishness displayed by people in power. Unfortunately they had this in common with ordinary people, which is why people got together and singled out the schizophrenic.
It’s pretty obvious that if everyone is selfish they don’t want some idiot running around making a big deal about it. Originally when it all took place it was people with infantile personality that was in charge in society. It’s also these people that has the biggest problem with the schizophrenic, which makes it reasonable to believe it was these people who designed a behaviour that was supposed to neutralize the schizophrenic, that which we call structural violence today.
Another possibility is that people with infantile personality felt uncomfortable and singled out in the presence of the schizophrenic. If this was the case there is a psychological process in all of us that kicks in when we feel singled out and that is to point finger at the weakest person and accuse him for what you feel is being put onto you. This might have been what transpired originally, because in the presence of the schizophrenic these individuals feel as they are accused of being sick (crazy). We are real, they are fake. A fact that support this theory is that through history these individuals has always made damn sure to be in the position of the one who points the finger.
This personality's characteristics are social incompetence; unhealthy desire for power, unhappy and dissatisfied with life in general, suffering from a compulsive need to classify everything, sees himself as a superman (compare Nietzsche). They lack a conscience. The term infantile stems from that the development of personality is halted at about the age of twelve. These individuals have not successfully developed an identity and therefore lack in empathy, which is an obvious shortcoming among medical doctors. Basically these individuals have no personality, they have roles that they act in order to get the upper hand, or be socially accepted. The lack of identity activates the defence mechanism known as reaction formation and creates the delusion “I am somebody” (maybe I’m the superman that Nietzsche talked about), which also is hubris. Descartes said: “I think, therefore I exist”. These people think: “Somebody is kissing my ass, therefore I must exist”. This comes from that these individuals have replaced the idea of morality with submissiveness. This is why these individuals lack a conscience, which is an obvious shortcoming among medical doctors.
The idea of a black and white world makes the more intelligent individuals with this personality highly attracted to become medical doctors. This will give them the ultimate position of power since they become the ones who control life and death. We, their patients, are forced to lay our lives in the hands of doctors so we damn better show them submissiveness. Medical doctors are also in the position to classify everything as healthy or sick, which is another kick these people get. Those who become psychiatrists are probably sadists that use projection when diagnosing schizophrenics. These individuals also invented the IQ-test, which measures the degree of conscious logical thinking and how it’s influenced by the unconscious.
Another characteristic behaviour among these individuals is that when they are not successful at something they simply switch to something else instead of making an effort of becoming better. This is because of their belief that they somehow should be special and good at something. To them life is supposed to be easy. If things become difficult just do something else. That’s how they deal with adversity in life.
It’s my understanding that these individuals in the past always have tried to uphold the power over life and death, which means that these individuals used to become priests as long as the church had any influence in society or in matters of life and death.
It's my understanding that the schizophrenic has helped society evolve since the dawn of time. This is through the knowledge the schizophrenic possess about how nature works. There must always have been systems set up in society to evaluate the information given by the schizophrenic. The personality of Jesus was therefore turned into a religion (Christianity), which itself has had tremandous influence on society. Likewise Buddha’s teaching.
Somewhere along the road someone figured out that people with schizophrenia produce more information the more they are abused. This seems to be the idea that psychiatry is based on. The basic principle of psychiatry than becomes to make people submissive by scientific abuse. It starts with that society actively persecutes the schizophrenic this makes Nature pissed off. What Nature does is to mentally slain the schizophrenic, what is left of the schizophrenic is taken care of by psychiatry and by making the schizophrenic experiencing anxiety they make him/her submissive. Basically what we are talking about is how to mentally slain a person to extract all available information. The methods Nature uses to slain the schizophrenic was developed during the 1950-70th in a top secret project called MKULTRA. The worst method developed for altering the personality is called psychic driving. For more information about MKULTRA follow this link: MKULTRA . Anti-psychotics is given to the schizophrenic to make his personality more pliable and as such easier to destroy, which results in technological and scientific advances but his personality has no more effect on society. It should be noted that Nature charges for the information extracted through earthquakes and other natural disasters. This might be an explanation for the 1976 earthquake in China (T’ang-Shan) that killed 240 000 people and that made the Cultural Revolution came to an end. The 2004 tsunami might have been a charge for the value of my article “An Excursion in Modern Psychology”. I suspect that World War I and II were the result of over ambitious psychiatrist. There is nothing like a good war to speed up evolution.
My personal observations of society give support to the following theory for what schizophrenia is all about. The schizophrenic has the same basic function in society as a catalyst has in a chemical system. That is to make it easier to create certain behaviours in society that otherwise would have taken a longer time to establish. That means that the schizophrenic speeds up evolution.
More specifically the schizophrenic grows up in a society and become a reflection of his own society. All unconscious models that make the schizophrenic happy in addition to the inherited ones are the unconscious models that the schizophrenic catalyse. This means that the schizophrenic catalyse the formation of unconscious model in individuals susceptible to them. This I base on the observation that there is an increasing moral awareness in society and I know I have a very high morality.
Each human is born with the ideas of unconscious models that have been passed on to them by their parents. This means that if the parents have a certain unconscious model that contains behaviour towards schizophrenics, an idea of this model is inherited by the child. It is now enough to expose the child to a schizophrenic and the idea will develop in to an unconscious model for behaviour towards schizophrenics. This type of unexplainable behaviour is known as structural violence. The funny thing is that even the schizophrenic himself has this idea for behaviour towards other schizophrenics. The purpose of all structural violence is to preserve the existing order of society. Schizophrenia itself is the last shred of influence in society that the medical profession has. Consequently the only change of power that will take place when schizophrenia cease to exist is that the influence exerted by the medical profession will come to an end.
In today’s organized society the structural violence against schizophrenics have become institutionalized in the form of psychiatry and the diagnose schizophrenia. So now we have psychiatrists out working among people and teaching them new and more effective ways of hurting the schizophrenics. This more scientifically designed unconscious model will now be passed on to the next generation. It all sounds like George Orwell’s book “1984” where people were taught two minutes hate while watching a picture of the enemy. There is now talking about how to reduce the stigma regarding schizophrenics. In “1984” this was called double think I believe. The issue seems to be whether to put an end to institutionalized violence and then try to reduce the stigma. Not the other way around.
Finally, why do schizophrenics act so weird? It’s because the structural violence (torture) against them has destroyed their unconscious models that controls behaviour towards other people. This is because the schizophrenic cannot understand that medical doctors are basically psychopaths with impulse control. In understanding the cause for schizophrenia we also understand the cure, which is cognitive psychology in combination with the ideas of moral treatment as developed during the 1840th by Quakers in the USA, not psychiatry.
Democracy has had the effect that people with infantile personality has become neutralized themselves and has been removed from all power with the exception of the medical profession. People in the democratic system do not display selfish behaviour any more like they did in the past. This means that the reason for schizophrenia has disappeared since democracy is a system designed to serve the people not the one’s in power. This together with the diversity and tolerance of today’s society should make it possible to incorporate the schizophrenic in society with the same rights as everyone else.
This article exposes the truth about schizophrenia and in doing so hopefully help to reduce the stigma. In my article called An Excursion in Modern Psychology I bring forth theories that should make it possible for psychiatry to let go of schizophrenia. Someone might say that my analysis of the medical profession is contra-productive. It’s my understanding of psychology that a person or group of people must be made aware of their own shortcomings in order to be capable of accepting others. If my theories are any good they should put an end to institutionalized structural violence and help the medical profession to evolve as a group.
The questions we are left with are: Can a society call itself civilized and at the same time mentally slain schizophrenics in the name of progress? Isn’t the behaviour defeating its own purpose?
Comment: The information presented here are the truth to the best of my knowledge. I’m fully aware of how outrageous it seems to accuse the medical profession of torture and of withholding information from the public. What if this is the truth? There is no reality, only perception.