I claim that schizophrenia (psychiatry) and the evolution that comes with it can be viewed as a drug addiction on a social scale. One can either view society or democracy as the addict. They are more or less one and the same. Withdrawal symptoms on a social scale will be to come to terms with what has been done to the individual labelled schizophrenic in the name of progress and evolution. It does not work to sweep a problem under the rug. We also need to replace the institution called psychiatry and put something completely different in its place. Notice that the way psychiatry helps its patients are by allowing them to hit rock bottom, while psychologists cognitively try to make the patient understand his situation and make him understand that he needs to quite his addiction before something bad happens.
Currently schizophrenia is having a strong moral effect on the world. The problem is that schizophrenia is no longer having its normal course where the individual is being scientifically and systematically reduced to mental garbage, which is what psychiatrists normally proudly presents to the public as schizophrenia. Psychic driving is the mechanism that the medical profession has developed to ensure everlasting demand for its drug. Schizophrenia is also an addiction for the medical profession since it gives them a power kick. Schizophrenia is designed by the medical profession to indirectly give them influence in the democratic society since they are in the position to modify behaviours or mentally terminate the schizophrenic at any time. This could explain why women have had such a hard time advancing in society. Medical doctors are nothing more than power crazed borderline insane individuals. The ability to avoid getting locked up despite the obvious lack of conscience is called to be rational.
Currently we see an effect all over the world of democratisation, anti-corruption and willingness to assist Africa. Democratisation will take place at a slower rate if evolution is slowed down, which actually might help avoiding possible civil wars although morality counteracts this. War is always the fastest track to evolution. Corruption will continue to be a problem if we slow down evolution, but it does not seem like an important issue to resolve today. As moral behaviour becomes the norm corruption will cease to be a problem. The industrialised nations (UN) and Africa seems to have developed a package for how to address poverty in African nations that seem reasonable to all involved parties. This aid package is being implemented as I write. To slow down evolution does not effect the aid in place. The industrialised nations need to wait a year or two to evaluate the initial effect of the aid package. At that time we should start getting feedback in the form of decreasing number of deaths caused by extreme poverty. Also economical growth should be seen at that time. At that time we will see if we are on the right track. If everything looks good one can start discussing and planning for additional measures that can be take 5-10 years down the road when the first aid package should have made a major impact on the African continent. However, most people already seem to agree that what is needed later on for Africa is trade. This means that the industrialised nations will have to make plans for cutting back subsidies. So what we are looking at is to create unemployment in the industrialised nations. To me it looks like a good idea to just sit down and wait and see what happens. This will give people time to see the effect of well-planned aid and to accept the idea of creating unemployment to help Africa. Subsidies should only be used short term to help an industry make necessary changes in order to become competitive. The only other use of subsidies should be to inject money into the economy by selling something people want to a lower price. Itís a shame to produce food with subsidies and call it aid when the purpose is to increase your own economy. If you produce something that sells for $100, you can subsidies it with $50 and sell it for $50. The $50 subsidies should be fresh printed money. The actual amount of money in the country has increased with $50. Instead of being backed by gold in a central bank the money is backed by the value of the produced goods. If one wants to inject money into an economy I would recommend building houses with subsidies. One has to make sure to keep a certain unemployment among construction workers to avoid increased salaries because you want new jobs to be created and not make people that have a job richer. To produce food that you burn with subsidies is just like printing money. If you give the food as aid thatís okay. However, thatís not very ethical since you force unemployment on the country receiving aid.
If we step back a little bit it looks like evolution is about globalisation (free trade, internet) and perhaps solidarity (morality?), but who gives a shit? If Nature cannot deliver this it has to deliver something that creates anxiety to change the behaviour known as schizophrenia. To me it looks like it is not possible to continue on this globalisation and I know many thousands of French farmers who agree with me. Right now EU (free trade) is about to fall apart because of subsidies. People need time to understand and adapt. All of these moral issues that are dealt with take time. Thatís part of morality to look at long-term effects and not short-term effects. Morality itself is a slow process. To speed up the process would be the equivalent of turning a 500, 000 ton oil tanker into a speedboat. Try to navigate that baby. This article is a cognitive way to try to stop evolution, which is something Iíve been trying to do for a long time. My approach has all along been to try to nullify the medical profession, which will put evolution back on its natural course. Notice that I was against cloning before I could prove it to be dangerous. My gut feeling is that people can not handle any more change (evolution), which means Nature will do something major. At that point we are going to get our hands full and will be forced to stop evolution or make a jump. Thatís called anxiety on an individual level. On a social scale it could be war or some natural disaster. Remember, curiosity killed the cat. If evolution is allowed to continue at a normal pace what will happen is that society will go through a catharsis over some time untill morality as a behaviour has established full dominance. This is the same catharsis that a society goes through when changing from dictatorship to democracy. This means that we are purging ourselves of the last remains of dictatorship in our personality. We will than have become fully democratic beings. So lets hope for a catharsis instead of war or natural disaster.
There are three characteristics normally associated with a drug addiction. Firstly, an overall positive effect. Secondly, there is a contradiction between the ideas that the addict values and the ideas or behaviours that come with the drug. Thirdly, there is some kind of withdrawal symptom that is uncomfortable. Finally one could require the existence of a pusher, someone benefiting from the addiction.
A humane using heroine gets relief from anxiety. He values the idea that he is free, but the drug turns him into a slave or ass kisser. He gets mental and physical abstinence from not getting the drug.
A society using evolution eases tension in society by introducing change on an individual level. Change in the individual becomes progress in society. Democracy perpetuates the idea of equal value, but the drug requires that some humans be sacrificed. Democracy perpetuates the idea of the majorityís best, but anything that is kept a secrete from the public is undermining this. This idea is based on openness, not secrecy. Democracy will be ashamed one day to explain what has been done to a group of people in the name of progress. People expect better behaviour from democracy. People themselves never behave better than the system they live in. The system is the role model for all humans of a society. Democracy is of course dependent on the medical profession who can manipulate democracy anyway it wants with its superior intelligence using the drug schizophrenia. The day the medical profession figures out how to use schizophrenia to get full control over democracy it will attempt doing so. Actually that is what schizophrenia today looks like, but God got fed up and sent me to put things back on tracks.
The current evolution is about morality. This will by itself evolve into love since morality is one of the components of love. By introducing morality now society will have hundreds of years of progress ahead of it. To my understanding the need for change in the individual is not very strong when one reaches this level, which means progress in society will slow down. I know we will always keep changing just not in the current pace. I claim that psychiatry is not acceptable, because it requires that an illusion of the medical doctor be perpetuated. Ignorance is suffering and having illusions are a form of ignorance. I claim God exist and indirectly I would be proof of this since the treatment known as schizophrenia is beyond any idea we have of hell. This proves that medical doctors therefore must be the one called the devil since they can create something that are beyond our worst nightmare. My claim of medical doctors is that with the right motivation they will all become dr. Mengele or worse dr. Cameron. They have in them the capacity for unlimited evil. That does not mean they do evil.
Comment: If my view in anyway effects the world than we have today reached a turning point. My conclusion is there can be no going back and everything is moving along perfectly. I'm sure I'll one day get to see the medical profession being nullified and hopefully I will help nailing the coffin shut.